As
someone who has attended meetings school board meetings in several states and
served on two such boards I know the routine well. The meetings of the
Christina Board of Education follows a long established tradition. The
administration carefully choreographs every step to minimize any risk of being
embarrassed. Board meetings are indeed
choreographed. I'm sure there is a desire to minimize the embarrassment
factor, but the meetings follow a predictable format to ensure the
structure that prevents the meetings from becoming a free-for-all. As
far as that embarrassment may seem to be an issue, the CSD board has
always been especially skilled at embarrassing itself. As a former board
member, it's true, whether or not individuals chose to admit it - we
open our mouths and insert our feet.
There
the usual awards recognitions for students and staff. Often this is the most
fulfilling part of the entire meeting. By the end of my four years, this was truly most rewarding part of the evening. Next there is public comment. Here you,
the public, can make statements that are met with contemptuous silence. The
silence is entirely by design. The board cannot respond to every
single person, individually at the meeting, who chooses to speak. CSD
already holds the state record for the longest board meetings in
history. However, there is also logic behind this policy - board members
frequently are hearing one side of a story for the first time when a
parent speaks at pubic comment. Good, bad or indifferent to the story,
diligence requires that we hear both sides and realize that the truth
minus the emotion usually lies somewhere in between the two. Notably,
the current superintendent has been empowered by the board to facilitate
introductions between commenters and district staff during the meeting
to help begin the process of addressing concerns. And of course, if you
go back to the embarrassment quotient, CSD board members frequently
violate their own rules and speak to the commenters. Oh, if
you say something that makes the administration uncomfortable the sound
recording of the meeting is mysteriously “lost” and even the minutes are written
so as not to reflect the topic of your statement.
As one of two board members who fought to get CSD meetings recorded,
this statement saddens me. During my time - from the commencement of
recording to the end of my term on June 30th - CSD had only one meeting
where we encountered audio problems that prevented recordings. And the
policy directs that the meeting occurs regardless of whether or not the
recording equipment is operating - the meetings proceed b/c the work
that needs to be done is usually tied to deadlines, many of which are
imposed upon the district by outside agencies such as DOE, state
law/regs/code, etc.
Harry
does earn a pass on audio quality - sometimes speakers just can't get
their mouths near enough to the mics and that makes some files hard to
hear.
Next
there are the reports of various committees, some relevant while others are
smoke and mirrors. Finally late in the meeting there are items that may require
some discussion. The administrations hopes that by this time most of the public
has left in case there is, God forbid, any discussion. I
don't know what the admin thinks, but genuine board members and there
are few on CSD's board want the public to stay for the discussion.
Trust me, it would make our lives a lot easier if they did!
As I
said, I’m accustomed to the script used at schoo l board meetings. I don’t like
it and when I had the opportunity I did all I could to change it. Of all the statements
made at the meeting the most asinine is “YOU ARE OUR GUESTS”. This grand
pronouncement by the board president at the beginning of every meeting is
ignorant, insulting and......WRONG! To each his
own. I see this statement as a reminder that the meetings have structure
and need structure. It also delineates the monthly board meeting as
different than the public forums and workshops that the board holds
where the public can participate freely, rather than observe as they do
at the monthly meeting.
Public
meetings of the Christina Board of Education, or any other public body in
Delaware are public meetings. You and I have every right to be there and
the school administration knows it. Of course as with any right it can be
abridged for creating a disturbance, hindering the orderly conduct of the
meeting etc. Yet, the statement “YOU ARE ARE GUESTS” is fundamentally a lie.
The “YOU ARE OUR GUESTS” declaration is intended to intimidate, it has no other
purpose. Disagree. But, again, to each his own. I
don't take the statement personally, not as a parent/member of the
public before I ran nor after as a district parent now.
To be
sure there are quests at every meeting of the Christina Board of Education.
These guests sit at a table with nice name plates in front of them, these
guests are the members of the Board of Education. They sit there as a guest of
the people who elected them and the children they are supposed to serve.. Every
so often we need to be tell them “YOU ARE OUR GUESTS.” Disagree.
The folks with the goofy name plates (and you made me think that I
should have kept mine - I totally forgot to ask for it when I retired)
were elected to do a job. They are on that stage trying to do that job.
Yep, they serve at your pleasure. And if you don't like their
performance, you can fire them every five years on a rotating election
schedule. And there have been some that I would have loved to fire.
Perhaps,
Harry, it's time to throw your hat in the ring and put your
boardsmanship experience to good use - win and reform the board.
Harry
6 comments:
I never had a problem with a meeting of CSD. Didn't like the admin. from Broad much though.
Harry is dead right. The speech at the beginning is 100% anti-transparency and a joke. It was bullshit when Eric did it, when Fred did it and when Dave does it.
I wonder who was the last board president to actually respect the audience by not insulting them with the bullshit diatribe at the beginning. We are there as their guests, it's their schools and their meeting, they merely elected us to conduct it, not condescend to them while doing it.
Rock on Harry.
The speech has nothing to do with transparency, pro or against. It's perfunctory.
Let's see, the script was utilized under Durr, Resler, Evans, Anderson... I believe Mr. Young may have eliminated the script... And then it resurfaced under Polaski.
And if you find it so condescending, anonymous, why don't you motion to eliminate it from future meetings. Better question: Why haven't you previously articulated your objections to it in your formal role?
Nancy,
Me neither.
I have.
It sure is perfunctory:
per·func·to·ry
/pərˈfəNGktərē/
Adjective
(of an action or gesture) Carried out with a minimum of effort or reflection.
Synonyms
superficial - cursory - shallow - skin-deep - sketchy
It's awful and demeaning to the taxpayers and full of arrogance. Supporting it is just buying into the BOE superiority complex.
The speech is utter garbage.
Anon,
Stop preaching and go change it.
Post a Comment
Word Verification May Be Case Sensitive