Follow Us on Twitter

Jake's Take on DE's Pooch Patrol Problem. With a special Nod To Patricia Blevins!

Jake left a fascinating comment on yesterday's satyric post on an animal welfare and the SPCA's serving Delaware.  I don't usually wade into this type of manure. I just wanted to make a point - ALL of the agencies and organizations claiming to be serving our state's unwanted, lost, and sick animals are playing politics when they shouldn't be. They should be playing caregiver.  Except, that would require certain politicians to stop playing God.  And some just can't...stop. Like a trainwreck, Patti.

And be sure to follow the link below to Delaware SPCA's response to yesterday's NJ story.  Their director is far better spoken that First State's Director Usilton.  (And I still think that someone's contract should be euthanized.)

Here ya go, Jake.  And Happy Autism Awareness Day!

Jake has left a new comment on your post "Playing Politics with Innocent Animals - Not an Ed...": 

The director at Delaware SPCA provided an excellent response to the inflammatory nature of the article. Fortunately residents can see what is happening, and a state contractor trying to strong arm other shelters to force them to do their job is completely innapropriate. 
https://www.facebook.com/DelawareSPCA/posts/1065227660185721

Before dog control contracts, Kent County SPCA (now known as First State Animal Center) was a small shelter and built the larger facility to do their job as dog control. Needless to say, the majority of their funding was pulled due to politics by the State, and as a result their are limited funds to hold animals. 

Capacity care for animals is based on the number of personnel and health resources needed to care for those animals, and Kent County has the smallest population in the state with under 170,000 people and with lower per capita earnings, so clearly the donation pool is much smaller than the shelters in New Castle County. As a result, FSAC is using boarding and daycare in the second building to supplement their donations to still remain a larger number of animals than they handled before dog control. Unfortunately Mr. Lamb doesn't have the business sense to realize that a shelter with a donation base under half a million can't handle the same number of dogs as they were handling when their revenue was $4 million with the various contracts. 

Mr. Lamb wanted the contract and has aligned himself with the folks that have been trying to put FSAC out of business for years, but what I think is odd is that those complaining about the SPCA's never spoke up when Faithful Friends wasn't taking dogs from FSAC, and was also importing animals from other states. In fact, BVSPCA also still imports dogs into their shelter, and where is the shock and awe about the fact he wants other shelters to do his job while he brings animals into his shelter from the south?

Maybe folks need to accept the reality that a handful of folks plotted and planned to get FSAC out of dog control and those folks and their new contractor need to assume responsibility for those actions. 

-Original Message----- 
From: "Blevins Patricia (LegHall)" 
To: Anne Cavanaugh 
Cc: "Ranji Jennifer (Governor)" , "jane@faithfulfriends" , "bengal98@aol" 
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:39:14 +0000 

Subject: RE: meeting tonight recap - confidential 
Maybe you could bid on Kent County at $3.52 per person, same as Wilmington. You would beat their bid. If they lost just one contract, they would be underwater for sure, because they are so drastically underbidding New Castle County.
Category: 0 comments

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Word Verification May Be Case Sensitive