I think this is a terrible idea. What this bill would do, is deny states their actual say.
For example, if Delaware voted 60-40 for President Obama, but the nation voted 50.1 to 49.9 for Romney, then Delaware's electoral votes would go to Romney based on the voters in other states.
While the popular vote sounds and feels good, our founding fathers created the electoral college as a system designed to protect the nations leaders from the ignorant masses (main reason) but also to protect the rights of states, just like assigning 2 senators to each state regardless of size.
In addition there are additional states rights' concerns, specifically the right of states to set the manner in which it selects its electors.
http://www.lwvvc.org/NPVArgument_con.pdf
I believe the National Popular Vote is a proxy for the rejection of the 10th Amendment and not in the best interests of individual states.
WHEREAS the popular vote in some States other than New York has been unfairly affected by barriers to voting, such as lifetime disenfranchisement due to felony conviction, requirement for government-issued photo ID and/or other documents, which creates unfair restrictions on certain groups of voters such as minorities, the poor, the disabled, and the elderly; and
WHEREAS many States use paperless electronic voting machines that cannot be independently audited, and only a few States perform any audits of their elections, so that in most states malicious tampering and innocent errors that increase or decrease vote tallies cannot and will not be detected; and
WHEREAS federal legislation would be required to compel all states to participate in meaningful audits of their elections for national offices, but Congress has not passed such legislation during the past nine years during which it has been introduced, and
WHEREAS New York State is the only state that worked diligently for four years to obtain electronic voting equipment that consists of secure machines and software by requiring electronic voting equipment to pass testing by an independent testing lab prior to purchase, so that our vote tallies are likely to reflect the votes cast; and
WHEREAS New York’s participation in the NPV initiative would constitute our endorsement and toleration of insecure voting systems, and of prejudices and restrictions against minority and less powerful voting groups; and
WHEREAS New York’s participation in the NPV initiative would be contrary to the principles of New York State and would compromise the voting freedoms and principles we endorse;
THEREFORE the Village Independent Democrats urges our State Assembly and State Senate to oppose any legislation supporting NPV.
2 comments:
I think this is a terrible idea. What this bill would do, is deny states their actual say.
For example, if Delaware voted 60-40 for President Obama, but the nation voted 50.1 to 49.9 for Romney, then Delaware's electoral votes would go to Romney based on the voters in other states.
While the popular vote sounds and feels good, our founding fathers created the electoral college as a system designed to protect the nations leaders from the ignorant masses (main reason) but also to protect the rights of states, just like assigning 2 senators to each state regardless of size.
In addition there are additional states rights' concerns, specifically the right of states to set the manner in which it selects its electors.
http://www.lwvvc.org/NPVArgument_con.pdf
I believe the National Popular Vote is a proxy for the rejection of the 10th Amendment and not in the best interests of individual states.
WHEREAS the popular vote in some States other than New York has been unfairly affected by barriers to voting, such as lifetime disenfranchisement due to felony conviction, requirement for government-issued photo ID and/or other documents, which creates unfair restrictions on certain groups of voters such as minorities, the poor, the disabled, and the elderly; and
WHEREAS many States use paperless electronic voting machines that cannot be independently audited, and only a few States perform any audits of their elections, so that in most states malicious tampering and innocent errors that increase or decrease vote tallies cannot and will not be detected; and
WHEREAS federal legislation would be required to compel all states to participate in meaningful audits of their elections for national offices, but Congress has not passed such legislation during the past nine years during which it has been introduced, and
WHEREAS New York State is the only state that worked diligently for four years to obtain electronic voting equipment that consists of secure machines and software by requiring electronic voting equipment to pass testing by an independent testing lab prior to purchase, so that our vote tallies are likely to reflect the votes cast; and
WHEREAS New York’s participation in the NPV initiative would constitute our endorsement and toleration of insecure voting systems, and of prejudices and restrictions against minority and less powerful voting groups; and
WHEREAS New York’s participation in the NPV initiative would be contrary to the principles of New York State and would compromise the voting freedoms and principles we endorse;
THEREFORE the Village Independent Democrats urges our State Assembly and State Senate to oppose any legislation supporting NPV.
Post a Comment
Word Verification May Be Case Sensitive